Insanity

How do you insanely compile a poem of picturesque pictures imaged by an imagination warped by the thoughts and images of a warped world? Where do superficial super-social societies slowly convene to concern themselves with the superficiality of their own beings, being not a superficial body of being itself? And how can the context and subtext of of all this script be compiled in a manuscript for simply simplified understanding of those under the standing required for a manuscript to be created by? So where does society and insanity cross as, quite possibly, there is no cross, but it is so often assumed that across this cross, people are categorised because the people of a superficial society of super-superficiality become cross with the people across the cross? Now the question above the questions questioned before this question of questions is whether the cross person who writes about this cross of superficiality is actually across the cross or one of the cross of the super-society of super-superficiality that sees the cross and those who cross the cross, while making cross those who do not cross the cross. So am I across the cross, or does this insanely sane ramble of insanity seem strangely sane to one across the cross or one who has not crossed the cross? The answer is there if you wish to see it and be it that you wish to see it, you could easily see that what is written isn't smitten with anger from a cross being from across the cross or not across the cross, for I am not cross, but I point out that, whether I be across the cross or embossed on the land that is not across the cross, the land that is not across the cross is indeed embossed with superficiality of society that exiles those who do not become superficial or fit in with society's social standings and cannot understand these beings. Therefore, is it better to cross the cross of non-superficiality or stay across the side of super-superficiality, between which there is no mind-point that can be pointed at of superficiality? Regardless of myself, even though super-superficiality of a super-society of social superficial standings seems far too superficial for me, being a being of natural non-superficiality, do you wish to stay before the cross with the cross people, cross with those who cross the cross, or would you prefer to be one who has crossed the cross of those who couldn't care about those who are cross with the fact that they'd crossed the cross? And do I speak from a stand point of one who has crossed the cross, one who hasn't crossed the cross, or one who has crossed the cross and returned across the cross? Or was I born across the cross? Now, from each of these different standpoints, do I speak with bias or without? Have I mimicked insanity to act across the cross to seem unbiased or am I unbiased without crossing the cross or am I one trying to be one who has not crossed the cross so that I am seen as unbiased or am I one who has crossed the cross and speaks with an unbiased opinion? Don't pin the question above upon me. I'm just a raving wreaking screeching wreck of insanity...